Some one should have posted this before!
1
81 replies to this topic
#81
-
- Members
-
- 146 posts
Member
- Gender:Not Telling
- Location:Central States
- Interests:Getting the REAL information to the members.
Posted April 06 2012 - 07:14 PM
#82
-
- Members
-
- 5,844 posts
Hardcore Member
Posted April 07 2012 - 01:32 AM
-Der Rittmeister-
H.m.m.m....you're "an informed and educated Teamster", are you? So informed that you **KNOW** that, when speaking of me, you can state unequivocally that....
"You were never a member of a Union!"?
...or that....
"You have failed to get ahead or promoted and blame everyone for your failure"?
Are you THAT well "informed"? Have you so well "informed" yourself, for example, that you can again state unequivocally that...
"You liked to take credit for things that the Union did that helped you but you never really did any of the REAL work at your state capitol"
...among other things personally about me?
I notice that you used the indicative mood, and spoke in the present tense, in ALL those statements; i.e. - you were declaring them to be CURRENT AND ABSOLUTE FACTS! Not suppositions, not conditional statements, but rather absolute FACTS!
Given that, you can tell us just WHEN I "failed to get promoted", can't you? And you can account for ALL the periods of my life when I was NOT " a member of the union", right? Or indicate just WHAT "state capitol" it was that I didn't do "any real Work" in, surely? And, after declaring that - again speakig of me - "I know who you are at your worksite. You are the constant complainer, the agitator and aggravator", you can specify just WHAT "worksite" I AM AT (again, you used the PRESENT tense), and just what things I *AM* "agitating" about, can't you?
How does an "informed" and "educated" Teamster such as yourself answer questions like those which concern his OWN statements? You *CAN* answer those specific question and explain all those quite specific declarations, can't you, "Rittmeister"? Because, if you couldn't, that would mean that you were nothing more than a common liar. And an "informed and educated Teamster" like you wouldn't be THAT, would he? [grin!]
Sorry "Rittmeister", but, with your statements, you've hoisted yourself on your own petard. You don't know what or where my "workplace" is, you don't know my "promotion" history, my past union status, or essentially any other personal information about me; you didn't even "inform" yourself to the extent of what limited information has been revealed about me on this board. In truth, you *ARE* the "trash talking internet troll"; the truth simply isn't in you.
In light of your claims, I have to add to the old "saw" floated around her on T-Net, namely:
"You can lead a Teamster to T-Net, but you can't make him think"
...which now needs to be changed to....
""You can lead a Teamster to T-Net, but you can't make him think...or tell the truth"
What's all this mean? Oh, I think you know the answer to that. I.e. - you're not "an informed and educated Teamster"; rather, you're just a simple garden variety LIAR. You must make your fellow Teamsters so VERY proud! [grin!]
Again, you are what you are, "Rittmeister". Deal with it.
-scb-
P.S. - Got a feeling that you'd yell "troll" at anybody who called you up on your lying, cheating diatribes. Now wouldn't THAT be a surprise...a dishonest Teamster who hates both to face the truth and those who present it!!! Gosh, the IMPROBABILITY of it all!
P.P.S. - As for your "I am not sure why the moderators allow you to take up space here", I'm not sure myself...although I suspect they may tolerate me partially because I represent a form of pest control. Historically - much as I'm functioning now - I've helped keeping dishonest vermin at bay here on T-Net.
H.m.m.m....you're "an informed and educated Teamster", are you? So informed that you **KNOW** that, when speaking of me, you can state unequivocally that....
"You were never a member of a Union!"?
...or that....
"You have failed to get ahead or promoted and blame everyone for your failure"?
Are you THAT well "informed"? Have you so well "informed" yourself, for example, that you can again state unequivocally that...
"You liked to take credit for things that the Union did that helped you but you never really did any of the REAL work at your state capitol"
...among other things personally about me?
I notice that you used the indicative mood, and spoke in the present tense, in ALL those statements; i.e. - you were declaring them to be CURRENT AND ABSOLUTE FACTS! Not suppositions, not conditional statements, but rather absolute FACTS!
Given that, you can tell us just WHEN I "failed to get promoted", can't you? And you can account for ALL the periods of my life when I was NOT " a member of the union", right? Or indicate just WHAT "state capitol" it was that I didn't do "any real Work" in, surely? And, after declaring that - again speakig of me - "I know who you are at your worksite. You are the constant complainer, the agitator and aggravator", you can specify just WHAT "worksite" I AM AT (again, you used the PRESENT tense), and just what things I *AM* "agitating" about, can't you?
How does an "informed" and "educated" Teamster such as yourself answer questions like those which concern his OWN statements? You *CAN* answer those specific question and explain all those quite specific declarations, can't you, "Rittmeister"? Because, if you couldn't, that would mean that you were nothing more than a common liar. And an "informed and educated Teamster" like you wouldn't be THAT, would he? [grin!]
Sorry "Rittmeister", but, with your statements, you've hoisted yourself on your own petard. You don't know what or where my "workplace" is, you don't know my "promotion" history, my past union status, or essentially any other personal information about me; you didn't even "inform" yourself to the extent of what limited information has been revealed about me on this board. In truth, you *ARE* the "trash talking internet troll"; the truth simply isn't in you.
In light of your claims, I have to add to the old "saw" floated around her on T-Net, namely:
"You can lead a Teamster to T-Net, but you can't make him think"
...which now needs to be changed to....
""You can lead a Teamster to T-Net, but you can't make him think...or tell the truth"
What's all this mean? Oh, I think you know the answer to that. I.e. - you're not "an informed and educated Teamster"; rather, you're just a simple garden variety LIAR. You must make your fellow Teamsters so VERY proud! [grin!]
Again, you are what you are, "Rittmeister". Deal with it.
-scb-
P.S. - Got a feeling that you'd yell "troll" at anybody who called you up on your lying, cheating diatribes. Now wouldn't THAT be a surprise...a dishonest Teamster who hates both to face the truth and those who present it!!! Gosh, the IMPROBABILITY of it all!
P.P.S. - As for your "I am not sure why the moderators allow you to take up space here", I'm not sure myself...although I suspect they may tolerate me partially because I represent a form of pest control. Historically - much as I'm functioning now - I've helped keeping dishonest vermin at bay here on T-Net.
