Titan89, on November 17 2011 - 08:41 PM, said:Don, I checked out your post today. Since I work in the area you speak of i knew it was probably another LIE to make Jim look bad and it was just that another LIE!!! I talked to my PT Sup and Ft Sup, both confirmed the spot vacated has not been filled. The Ptimer in the job is still on posi 1 manning list but helps us in irregs until further notice by RM. I talked with the BA handling the case, ask him if you don't believe me!
Your gossip and lies needs to stop! You have no clue as to what you are talking about. If you get a whiff of something, you run with it whether it is true or not to make Jim look bad. You are hurting grievances that are not settled and still pending!
Dewey is a friend of mine and I particuliarly DO Not care for you posting gossip about a NON SLATE MEMBER! He has not been apart of any of this and I do not even know who he supports. So for you to slander him is WRONG!
THIS GOSSIP AS YOU CALL IT CAME STRAIGHT FROM BRANDON ROTH'S MOUTH TALKING TO MANAGEMENT. I REPEATED WHAT ANOTHER HWUS SPOKEMAN, LIKE YOURSELF, SAID. I HAVE WITNESSES TO PROVE IT. WHEN YOU HEAR SOMETHING FROM SOMEONE ELSE, YOU GET ON HERE AND POST IT AS PROOF, BECAUSE SOMEONE SAID IT , IT MUST BE TRUE. IF I DO THIS, EVEN WITH WITNESSES, YOU SAY IT IS GOSSIP AND LIES. ONCE AGAIN, WHY DID JIM ANDERSON TRY, AN ANTI-UNION TACTIC, TO CUT A SIDE DEAL WITH MANAGEMENT TO GET HIS LOWER SENIORITY BROTHER IN LAW INTO THE IRREG JOB. YOU AND JIM ANDERSON ARE IN BED WITH THE COMPANY. IF SOMEONE IS DOING THIS JOB, THEN IT IS FILLED, WHETHER IT IS PERMANENTLY OR TEMPORARILY. IF YOU ARE JIM'S ALTENATE IN THIS BUILDING, YOU PROBABLY HAD SOMETHING TO DO WITH THIS OR HAD KNOWLEDGE THAT JIM WAS TRYING TO VIOLATE ANOTHER MEMBER'S SENIORITY. WHY DO YOU CONTINUE TO DEFEND THE FACT THAT JIM ANDERSON TRIED TO BYPASS SENIORITY, WHEN YOU KNOW THAT THIS IS WRONG? IF JIM ANDERSON HAD NOT TRIED TO MAKE A SIDE DEAL THAT WOULD VIOLATE ANOTHER MEMBER'S SENIORITY, THERE WOULD NOT BE A GRIEVANCE. ANDERSON CAUSED THIS WHOLE PROBLEM IN THE FIRST PLACE. WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT STEWARD'S OR ALTERNATE STEWARD'S ASSOCIATING WITH MANAGEMENT DURING OFF WORK HOURS?
ANDERSON HAS PROVEN THAT HE VIOLATES SENIORITY, IF HE BENEFITS FROM IT.
IS THIS WHAT YOU REALLY WANT AS PRESIDENT OF YOUR LOCAL?
VOTE THE ZUCKERMAN-BOLTON SLATE,
THEY UPHOLD SENIORITY.















