record poverty rate
#1
Posted September 13 2011 - 05:59 PM
http://www.marketwat...dips-2011-09-13
good job obama and the democrats
#2
Posted September 13 2011 - 08:51 PM
46.2million living in poverty
#3
Posted November 07 2011 - 08:28 PM
http://www.msnbc.msn...h/#.TriutUP7iMY
#4
Posted November 08 2011 - 05:04 AM
Hey we have plenty of money
The real crime today is not the wealth disparity of the rich and poor-it is the wealth disparity of the old and young--That is the legacy of the redistribution rhetoric from the left and our politicians selling votes
#5
Posted November 08 2011 - 11:49 AM
#6
Posted November 08 2011 - 12:03 PM
But that doesn't fit well with your continued flawed economic rhetoric--Care to guess farley the increase in the number of kids living with their parents after college--well we have a brand new term for it--boomerang kids
#7
Posted November 08 2011 - 08:08 PM
egghead, on November 08 2011 - 05:04 AM, said:
Hey we have plenty of money
The real crime today is not the wealth disparity of the rich and poor-it is the wealth disparity of the old and young--That is the legacy of the redistribution rhetoric from the left and our politicians selling votes
#8
Posted November 10 2011 - 12:04 PM
#9
Posted November 10 2011 - 02:56 PM
I don't believe an individual who recently claimed that....
"....the top 30 corporations also pay NOTHING!"
...is in a position to speak of anyone else as "more likely, just dishonest". Do you?
You are what you are. What gets me. I guess, is that you don't even seem to be ashamed of it.
-scb-
#10
Posted November 11 2011 - 04:30 AM
We have seeen in our lifetime the failure of these left wing economic theories on a massive scale with the failure of socialism in China and the old Soviet Union- Now we are living through the failure of the friendlier version of Socialism the so called Democratic vision of a social economic contract --Yet the left continues to scream wealth disparity--No one can be that stupid-
Southern Europe is a current living breathing "Democratic socialist" economic model that obliterates the economic theory of the left--"Higher taxes increased spending manipulated wage controls and lifetime benefits"
Yet you hang on Farley--So Farley who is "blind deaf and dumb"
Meanwhile who is left holding the bag for the fallacy that somehow people can magically recieve more money when they are unproductive than when they were productive--Think of that old fable of the grasshopper and the ant
and Farley you have to be a complete Moron not to see the real wealth disparity issue with the current ideology of the social economic contract--it transfers wealth from the young to the old at an ever growing percentage--
#11
Posted November 14 2011 - 11:01 AM
http://thinkprogress...tions-no-taxes/
take your reichwing goBPer dishonesty elsewhere, you are found out here and are like a dancing bear....amusing but without an ounce of credibility.
#12
Posted November 14 2011 - 12:15 PM
"Yet again"? Who are you trying to kid, "Farley"...unless by "yet again", you're acknowledging that once more you got caught red-handed making yet another bald-faced lie.
Remember, you claimed that,,,,
"the top 30 corporations also pay NOTHING!"
The link you provided doesn't make such a claim, nor do anything to substantiate that claim whatsoever. Once again, when a guy named "Farley" is asked to back-up his B.S., it seems he's unable to do so. Now isn't THAT a surprise!. Far from the first time it's happened.... and far from the last time as well, I'm sure.
Now whether pressing a liar on his lies is "reichwing" or what-not I couldn't say....but, in this articular dialogue, I think the evidence pretty much indicates just who is "dishonest". And it's NOT me, NOR is it those who go by the handles of "egghead" and "dockman", NOR the "reichwing goBPers" generally, but rather some shyster clown who goes by the name "Farley"....an individual who, for the life of him, can't seem to speak with any level of integrity, nor demonstrate any feeling of shame for his lack thereof.
You are what you are, "Farley"....deal with it.
-scb-
#13
Posted November 16 2011 - 11:27 AM
#14
Posted November 16 2011 - 12:54 PM
You think you were "correct" in claiming that....
"THE TOP 30 [note: not "thirty of", but rather "the TOP 30"!! ] corporations also pay NOTHING"
.......?????
As for me, "No, I do *NOT* know that to be 'correct'". In fact, I know it to be a bald-faced lie. And, given who the claim originated from, that's not at all a surprising state of affairs. No amount of you dancing around the fact, or trying to change the terms of what you said, or other artifice typically used by blow-hards of your ilk is going to change "what it is". Or what *YOU* are.
You are what you are, "Farley"....and what you are is a liar. That's your reputation and that's your reality. Deal with it.
-scb-
#15
Posted November 18 2011 - 10:44 PM
http://www.newsmax.c...11/17/id/418443
#16
Posted December 21 2011 - 04:10 AM
And there is widespread anger in Jefferson County that swingeing sewerage rate hikes could have been avoided but for the greed, corruption and incompetence of local politicians, government officials and Wall Street financiers.
He says he finds it cheaper to buy drums of water from a petrol station and pay a sanitation company about $14 a month to remove waste from his "porta-potty" than pay the combined sewer and water rate bill, which some months can reach $300.
And the JP Morgan connection gets uglier
Investment bank JP Morgan Securities and two of its former directors have been fined for offering bribes to Jefferson County workers and politicians to win business financing the sewer upgrade.
Six of Jefferson County's former commissioners have been found guilty of corruption for accepting the bribes, along with 15 other officials.
New county commissioners, struggling to service the debt they inherited from their crooked predecessors, took the decision to file for Chapter 9 bankruptcy last month.
But the county's bondholders, who stand to lose about $4.5m a month in repayments if the bankruptcy is allowed to proceed, are contesting it in court.
http://www.pdacommun...abama&Itemid=66
#17
Posted December 21 2011 - 08:50 AM
any correlation, you think?















