5831 replies to this topic

[saint cummings]

Copy on that I can't believe he shut Don slash little Dirty up like that.What you think Inthegame?You think Zuck did anything wrong?Did you keep up with the election?

[inthegame]

saint cummings, on January 02 2012 - 05:36 PM, said:

Copy on that I can't believe he shut Don slash little Dirty up like that.What you think Inthegame?You think Zuck did anything wrong?Did you keep up with the election?

I've only "kept up" through these posts. I don't know if Zuckerman did enough wrong to have any charges sustained if indeed any charges were filed timely. Bad behavior towards opponents usually doesn't rise to a sustainable charge. Time will tell.

[teamsteronfire]

I think you're absolutely correct "inthegame." However, poor behavior isn't the only thing zuckerman is guilty of. In my judgement, the man violated the law in numerous areas. Some federal, some local. I think if just look, you can see that somebody has called off the dogs. It wasn't long ago that his cronies were on here wailing, whining, pissing and moaning all over this forum. Now it's suddenly as quiet as a church mouse. I realize that's not indicative of anything, but you have to admit, it sure looks fishy. Lemme just tell you one of the things I've heard from a very reliable source. I've been told that zuckerman has told his people to "back off" because of all the crap that went on in this election. Basically he's let them know that he's in some sort of trouble or at least he thinks he COULD be due to the manner in which the election was won. Most likely there weren't any votes tampered with, but, the intimidation, the attempt to quell any sort of dissent, the threats, are all coming back to haunt him We shall see but it certainly sounds plausible if you have been reading this forum for any length of time. Notice all his supporters on this forum have basically either abandoned him or have been told to shut up. You can believe which is true...

WATCH!

[inthegame]

teamsteronfire, on January 02 2012 - 09:18 PM, said:

I think you're absolutely correct "inthegame." However, poor behavior isn't the only thing zuckerman is guilty of. In my judgement, the man violated the law in numerous areas. Some federal, some local. I think if just look, you can see that somebody has called off the dogs. It wasn't long ago that his cronies were on here wailing, whining, pissing and moaning all over this forum. Now it's suddenly as quiet as a church mouse. I realize that's not indicative of anything, but you have to admit, it sure looks fishy. Lemme just tell you one of the things I've heard from a very reliable source. I've been told that zuckerman has told his people to "back off" because of all the crap that went on in this election. Basically he's let them know that he's in some sort of trouble or at least he thinks he COULD be due to the manner in which the election was won. Most likely there weren't any votes tampered with, but, the intimidation, the attempt to quell any sort of dissent, the threats, are all coming back to haunt him We shall see but it certainly sounds plausible if you have been reading this forum for any length of time. Notice all his supporters on this forum have basically either abandoned him or have been told to shut up. You can believe which is true...

WATCH!

Or they figure the results are in, their guy won, and there's no real purpose to continue electioneering.

[saint cummings]

Thank you Inthegame for a honest answer I do appreciate that.I am not sure what anybody can prove.I know a few things but can not say on here.I hope you have a good new year

[teamsteronfire]

Saint, I'm like you. I know some things, but not at liberty to say what they are. I CAN tell you this much. I don't think mr. z will be very happy when this all plays out. "Inthegame" I think you may be correct except for one thing. z's supporters on this forum weren't actually "electioneering" for him on this forum. They were attacking those who opposed him. That's what's going to get him into trouble I think. I could be wrong, but from what I hear, Mr. z did violate some rules, bylaws, laws with his campaign. Now as to whether or not he could be in trouble remains to be seen. I will say this much. Knowing what I currently know, I wouldn't want to be him doing what he did to be elected. He had the election in the bag most likely from the beginning. There was no need to do some of the things he did. Same goes for anything the other side did. I think it was a fiasco from the get-go. There are some victims in this thing however. We shall see how it plays out. Zs election was a SNAFU, which means, "situation normal. All fu*#ed up."

WATCH!

[teamsteronfire]

Hey saint. It's been confirmed. I think there's an effort by zuck to keep his minions quiet due to the fact that he's scared of what he's done. We shall see but it sure looks fishy...
WATCH!

[saint cummings]

I can't confirm anything?
My understanding is they aren't scared?
Not sure if any charges has been filled on the attacking of that poor guy in the van I hear people are ready to come forward to help prove what happened.
Those people deserve whatever happens to them.
Somebody needs to stand up to those peacocks strutting around gloating.

[Shaman]

saint cummings, on January 05 2012 - 07:39 PM, said:

Somebody needs to stand up to those peacocks strutting around gloating.

[saint cummings]

Amen

[teamsteronfire]

Saint. They're all running scared. That's why you don't see any postings from them.

[saint cummings]

I don't think they are running I think they are home laughing.