Tdu Dead In Local 174
#21
Posted November 24 2009 - 12:13 PM
#22 Guest_Maximus_*
Posted November 24 2009 - 09:16 PM
#23 Guest_Buck_*
Posted November 25 2009 - 12:43 AM
Farley, on November 24 2009 - 08:30 AM, said:
It's ok for the senile fagley to jump topics when it suits him, especially when he won't answer honestly about a sleazy maneuver by a scabby jc 42 eboard buddy of his.
You are right, Maximus, fagley is worse than no help at all, he is the definition of the disease that currently afflicts the greatest union in the world.
Santangelo, Cammack, Bergen, Lennox etc etc fagley. Bunch of con artists. Thank god at least fagley and Santangelo are gone, hopefully ball-less bergen soon to go too.
#24
Posted November 25 2009 - 12:58 PM
As a reminder "guest" LB was hired by TDUBob, kept by Scott Sullivan, kept by TDUDan, and kept by Rick in 2007 and it looks like he still works there. So did you like LB when he worked for TDUBob, didn't like him when he worked for Scott, liked him when he worked for TDUDan, and now you don't like him because he works for Rick? Was LB ok when Brett was a BA at 174? Something tells me you have a political ax to grind combined with just a hint of "sour grapes". Put together a credible Slate and try again in three (3) years.
#25
Posted November 26 2009 - 08:42 AM
and "anon maximus" that name must be a latin adjective for just how misinformed you are. Hobie, the toodleooer of the year not associated with the toodleoo any more? Are you serious? the same Hobie that signed up many toodleoo members , whether they wanted to be members or not? but it still stands, if you want to be critical of the Local Union administration, at least get off your ass and participate instead of launching scuds from afar. it is fools like yourself that feed the anti-Union forces at the TDU, the right to work foundation, and the chamber of commerce.....maximus, if you want to see why Unions have been losing their clout, look in the mirror!
#26
Posted November 27 2009 - 08:54 PM
#27 Guest_Heard it all before_*
Posted November 30 2009 - 05:28 PM
#28
Posted December 06 2009 - 11:05 AM
#29
Posted December 06 2009 - 11:20 AM
Farley, on December 06 2009 - 11:05 AM, said:
Its good to see that Washington teamsters know the difference between rhetoric and leadership. As I'm not a member in Spokane, I hope they made the right choice to maintain their current leadership. 174 teamsters have always shown love to our brothers and sisters on the other side of the mountain. Congratulations tried and true Performance Team.
#30
Posted December 11 2009 - 02:22 AM
Farley, on December 06 2009 - 11:05 AM, said:
First off, my congratulations to Rick and company for their win, and good luck in your upcoming term in office. It is good to see folks be able to run and win by the members choice.
Secondly, Eric, I have to wonder where you get the idea that anyone who would dare oppose an administration and run against them is automatically TDU! I have seen you pull this out of your hat over the years, whether or not the people who stood up to try and make a change had anything to do with them or not. Because YOU say so, then all are supposed to believe it to be true...............
It is also apparent that according to you, the only way to win a campaign is to smear peoples family issues on the internet and go to great lengths to slander them without any proof of what you are posting. I had always thought the better of you but anymore I find the things I used to defend you from are coming out as the truth. Very sad indeed.
- saddletramp likes this
- Like This
#32 Guest_are you serious_*
Posted December 11 2009 - 04:58 PM
#33
Posted December 12 2009 - 03:57 AM
are you serious, on December 11 2009 - 04:58 PM, said:
Gee Eric, dont want to post under your screen name so you post as a guest? Why not bring out the proof you have that I and my fellow candidates where all members of TDU. You dont even know some of the people who ran so what makes you think you have all of us "figured out"?
Like I said before, anyone who dares to have a differance of opinion and want to bring change about for the members is automatically branded TDU with you and your cronies. The censoring of opinions and different ideas went away with Hitler and Stalin, and maybe you should try to let yourself believe people can have a differance of thought and not be drinking the TDU koolaid like you would have everyone believe.
The man you want to chastise was not a campaign manager, as we didnt have one. There was no blind ambition as you want everybody to believe; we went into this eyes wide open, wanting to bring change where change was needed, and there is plenty of that which needs to be! So I will ask you again, if you have the proof of the so called TDU alliance, then PROOVE it, show us the facts, or drop your bullshit once and for all.
- saddletramp likes this
- Like This
#34
Posted December 12 2009 - 09:57 AM
#35
Posted December 12 2009 - 04:49 PM
Hard to prove things that are not true huh.
- saddletramp likes this
- Like This
#36 Guest_Bob is TDU_*
Posted December 13 2009 - 02:30 PM
#37
Posted December 13 2009 - 06:55 PM
#38 Guest_Bob Dickland_*
Posted December 13 2009 - 10:08 PM
Farley, on December 13 2009 - 06:55 PM, said:
don't put bobs dirty panties on t net ken paff will be upset
#39 Guest_going in circles_*
Posted January 04 2010 - 05:14 AM
#40
Posted January 04 2010 - 07:32 PM
going in circles, on January 04 2010 - 05:14 AM, said:
I brought you some
and 
when you're done be sure you wash your mouth out with some















