On a contract that would give a company UNLIMITED part time workers when laid off and 10%ers would only be offered 3 hours a day. What union would endorse, and what good union man would vote for that?
1
WHY WOULD ANYONE VOTE YES?
Started by myrlredding, Apr 15 2008 03:39 PM
9 replies to this topic
#2
-
- Members
- 8 posts
New Member
- Gender:Male
- Location:san jose ca
- Local Union Number:287
Posted April 18 2008 - 05:01 PM
myrlredding, on Apr 15 2008, 03:39 PM, said:
On a contract that would give a company UNLIMITED part time workers when laid off and 10%ers would only be offered 3 hours a day. What union would endorse, and what good union man would vote for that?
#3
-
- Members
-
- 56 posts
Semi-Member
- Gender:Male
- Location:Chicago
Posted April 19 2008 - 06:32 AM
When are they announcing the results of the vote?
#4
-
- Gold Sponsors
-
- 1,111 posts
Journeyman Member
- Gender:Male
- Location:Southern California
- Local Union Number:986
Posted April 19 2008 - 04:11 PM
soon
Diapers and politicians need to be changed... often for the same reason.
#5
-
- Members
-
- 48 posts
Semi-Member
Posted April 21 2008 - 05:29 PM
chi705, on Apr 20 2008, 12:32 AM, said:
When are they announcing the results of the vote?
49% voted yes because they were lead to believe this was good without verifying any info at their disposal.
6% voted no because they will never vote yes.
2% voted no because TDU said not to.
18% voted yes because they think they can drop their CDL and never get drug tested again.
20% of the most junior drivers voted yes to save their jobs without realizing they voted themselves onto the unemployment line.
4% voted no after reading the contract themselves and did not like what was in it for themselves or their brothers and sisters.
1% voted no after listening to the 4% that voted no.
It's a sad day for the brotherhod.
#6
-
- Members
-
- 730 posts
Member
- Gender:Male
- Location:San Dimas, CA
- Local Union Number:63
Posted May 01 2008 - 03:04 PM
As I understand it, 82% voted yes.
#7
-
- Members
- 12 posts
New Member
Posted May 01 2008 - 04:57 PM
X174driver, on May 2 2008, 09:04 AM, said:
As I understand it, 82% voted yes.
#8
-
- Members
-
- 730 posts
Member
- Gender:Male
- Location:San Dimas, CA
- Local Union Number:63
Posted May 01 2008 - 07:35 PM
Based on that is the vote count on the National Deal. It will be reported tomorrow. I don't know the individual Local by Local numbers or what the various Local Riders were.
The National Deal and Operational Supplementals ratified by 82% yes, that for sure I know.
The National Deal and Operational Supplementals ratified by 82% yes, that for sure I know.
#9
-
- Members
-
- 36 posts
Semi-Member
Posted May 01 2008 - 08:26 PM
X174driver, on May 2 2008, 01:35 PM, said:
Based on that is the vote count on the National Deal. It will be reported tomorrow. I don't know the individual Local by Local numbers or what the various Local Riders were.
The National Deal and Operational Supplementals ratified by 82% yes, that for sure I know.
The National Deal and Operational Supplementals ratified by 82% yes, that for sure I know.
I can confirm the 82% voted yes, that means everyone read past the lies of TDU again! Unlimited part timers is not true...Max is 15%! It was good the IBT sent out copies of the contracts so poeple could read for themselves.
#10
-
- Members
-
- 359 posts
Member
- Location:San Francisco,CA
- Local Union Number:85
Posted May 02 2008 - 07:00 AM
sg1, on May 1 2008, 08:26 PM, said:
I can confirm the 82% voted yes, that means everyone read past the lies of TDU again! Unlimited part timers is not true...Max is 15%! It was good the IBT sent out copies of the contracts so poeple could read for themselves.
