X174driver, on Mar 8 2008, 10:34 PM, said:
You are correct, "mostly NMFA" except the DHL Agreement retains the 40 hour per month health and welfare qualifier and $1.15 more in wages over 5 years. The part-time language is the boogy man language that needs to be read and understood. It is true there are some large areas around the Country that have part-time language already. As I understand it the main issue is how the part-time language will affect Driver's ability to work 55 to 60 hours per week. Maybe people should think about the value of working 45 hours a week and spending more time with your wife and kids or more time doing what you "want" to do instead of "have" to do.
Another contract expert has spoken about a contract they haven't seen.
My understanding is that articles 1 thru 39 are the foundation, then the DHL National PUD section followed by the Regional supplement.
The effect of PTers is more than the possible Ot loss. Maybe you should consider the fact that some of us would rather have a parent home caring for the family while we work to have a solid home life. Are you fortunate enough to be able to manage on a single income? I am not saying we will work 55-60 hours a week but I take an early start to not only get out at a reasonable hour for family issues but YES it does mean my OT begins all that earlier too. There are weeks that I may work a Sat to get some hours and Saturday work for some stops once school gets out for the summer.
This is not the first time PTers has been played up as the help the company needs, they just abuse them. The hiring of PTers and the possible red circle of full time drivers will only see to the reduction of full time positions without the proper control over full time jobs.
The Teamsters were always about "family first" and some of the language in the proposal is detrimental to that cause. Part timers will NOT get all the Teamsters have to offer and UPS is NOT a company run like DHL.
I believe if every one took care of what they "have" to do it would be easier to do what they "want" to do.
I "must" provide a comfortable living and proper care for myself and my family. which I do. Not all are able to make it on fewer hours than the company has allowed us to work over the years. Were they thinking about hours when the posted all those 10 hour runs that begin a t 8 or 9 am? I think not. Those shifts take people out of their homes for the entire day. Leaving home at 7-730 to get in for a 8 am start to make del and pus and returns home after supper is over really helped the company didn't it? I think not and it certainly didn't propmote good family life.
Perhaps you should know what you are talking about, especially if it doesn't effect you.
This happens to effect many of us and some that don't even know yet.
Good luck
P.S. Why is there "outing" of users on this forum now?
The IBT gave NO information at all about these negotiations, TDU did.
( not that I promote TDU at all, which I don't )
Teamster First