APWA/ A New Vision For UPS Workers
#81
Posted April 26 2005 - 09:23 AM
When I have the chance or time, will check the archives as to your comments and or suggestions. Fair enough ?
"ect... the usual Teamsters justifications."
Thats a "member" mentality. And they speak of it.
Your next two (2) paragraphs kind of spell it out. You and I, both know the truth. Not a popular conclusion.
Lastly, "the NMFA a dead letter" come on.... deregulation. And the Teamsters did it ??
You have layed-out, on other occasions, what you thought.
UPS would "naturally give"..... No. Its not in the Companys interest to "give" anything, but to themselves. You had to work for it....
Here I have been, thinking you might be a voice of reason.... but now seemingly.... jumping on the APWA bandwagon.
Its not hard to fathom why.....
Here is a thought.... some or most people can't understand.
The principal of delayed gratification.
Think about it.
-Bug-
#82
Posted April 26 2005 - 10:16 AM
One quick comment. For all you rhetoric, you seem to have forgotten that it was the *company* that invited the Teamster's in their midst.....it wasn't a position the Teamsters "earned" by any stretch of the imagination.
As for my "jumping on the APWA bandwagon", I think I've made it perfectly clear that I'm not a proponent of that movement (Dare I ask it? Have you caught that so stereotypically Teamster "disease" of "jumping to conclusions as well?...grin!). Far from it; in fact, I see no reason for anyone to jump out of the frying pan into the fire. Much better, from my perspective, to jump with a purpose.......and clear the heat altogether.
Not sure where you're coming from with your other rather mysterious statements, other than to note that they don't seem to rebut the accuracy of mine. For example, the NMFA....are you seriously going to contend that it's anywhere's NEAR the force that it was a few decades ago?
Sorry....but facts are facts. And, as has been my contention all along, the longer the Teamsters insist on keeping their heads buried in the sand and ignoring those facts - and refusing to address them - the closer they come to total irrelevancy. I'd submit that these latest musings by IBT apologists against this weak-kneed ad hoc APWA "competion" - and the scatter-brained fervor with which they're shotgunned forth - amply demonstrates the truth of that contention.
But, as always, you're free to make your own choice. If you're comfortable with what the Teamsters have accomplished, and are "on track" to accomplish, then have it your way. Just be advised that the rest of the world doesn't seem to be inclined to follow that course into unreality, or feel the need to particularly accomodate those who do.
-scb-
#83
Posted April 27 2005 - 02:49 AM
I try to imagine what our future would look like if UPS hadn't taken this bribe by the union. Lets face it, $100 Mil, to a company the size of UPS is basicly chicken feed. It's definetly chicken feed to the company's current unfunded liability. My guess is that faced with more and more workers crossing the picket lines Carey would have been forced to allow a vote on contract that would have effectivly partitioned the funds. With the threat of Billions of dollars of liability gone, UPS could focus more on the competition, the workers would have more secure footing in their pensions, and the Teamsters would be reduced to what the APWA wants to be.
#84
Posted April 30 2005 - 05:47 AM
Prettry pathetic if you ask me. Over 10,000 workers that attempt to join a union are fired each year (which is illegal) but because of the stalling tactics and lack of any real penalties against companies for breaking the law, it is the preferred tactic to use to fight any organizing drive. That is why there aren't more union members in America. Let's not blame it all on the unions. Pass a law that says that companies need to stay neutral during organizing drives and that violations would land the lawbreakers in jail on a mandatory basis and watch the union membership numbers boom!
#85
Posted April 30 2005 - 09:40 AM
#86
Posted May 01 2005 - 04:27 AM
#87
Posted May 01 2005 - 08:09 AM
#88
Posted May 01 2005 - 03:41 PM
The APWA is such a resounding success....
At their "last" meeting.... after soliciting an entire state.... they were able to garner a whopping eleven (11) *members* to listen to their spiel.
One of who which, thought is was a meeting of the Central States.
Who's trying to fool who ???
-Bug-
#89
Posted May 01 2005 - 04:31 PM
#90
Posted May 01 2005 - 08:09 PM
#91
Posted May 02 2005 - 04:20 AM
There are a lot of people in my area that say they are waiting for the local and international Teamster elections so that they can vote the incumbants out, and then resign and join the APWA.
#92
Posted May 05 2005 - 08:11 AM
"Fully admit" Fully admit"
Why don't you "fully admit" you don't understand what "fully admit means." Least you wear out the statement without 1 iota of proof of it.
#93
Posted May 07 2005 - 04:52 AM
We are all still waiting to hear about your "honorable" discharge.....
-Bug-
#94
Posted May 07 2005 - 04:57 AM
sawman said:
#95
Posted May 08 2005 - 06:55 AM
This is how much distain UPSers in my area have for the powers that be, in the Teamsters union. They say all the time that if they are unsuccessful at voting them out then they are gone.
#96
Posted May 08 2005 - 08:35 PM
#97
Posted May 10 2005 - 06:15 AM
That's your opinion, and you know what they say about opinions!
Fact of the matter is that the Teamsters want last at UPS much past 2008. so you had better be looking for some sort of organized representation to take there place, or else UPS will eat you alive.
If it 's not the APWA, you better find something because time is short.
#98
Posted May 10 2005 - 10:52 AM
#99
Posted May 10 2005 - 05:38 PM
I think everyone is in tune to your reference of opinions....
They are alot like the APWA.
To quote you: "the Teamsters want last at UPS"
Nice verbiage. Didn't you mean won't ?? What a command of the english language. Kind of a scary thought.... that you, mud, and 101_st, would even consider propagating this nonsense when you have NO experience at all.
"Gained 11 new members" ?? No.... Thats how many showed up.... from an entire state.
Seems that the $150.00 "donation" is what is paying for the APWA to travel around.... Remember.... No Refunds.
-Bug-
#100
Posted May 11 2005 - 04:54 AM
The roof is going to come crashing down on your heads in 2008, and you are to narrow minded to see the cracks in the ceiling!
Upsbrother,
You got yours, so screw everyone else! Stay locked up in your little world, where ever that might be. Your fund is just another example of what we all should have, and we are going to get it, so sit back in your easy chair and watch.















