|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
|
Apr 2 2005, 10:24 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 206 Joined: 13-July 04 Member No.: 3,932 |
Readers,
Just doing a quick search, the self-appointed Leaders of the APWA are trying to Hide who they really are. Their domain name; itsmymap.com, is very well concealed. Using "Go Daddy Software, inc." it links you to: Domains by Proxy, inc. Created on: 30-sept-04 Expires on: 30-sept-05 "Please note: the registrant of the domain name is specified in the "registrant" field. In most cases, Go Daddy Software inc. is not the registrant of domain names listed in this database." Interesting. And a P.O. box number where to send money. TOTAL SCAM. -Bug- |
|
|
|
Apr 3 2005, 04:58 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 160 Joined: 15-February 05 Member No.: 4,336 |
BUG,
Keep up the good work. Getting kind of desperate aren't you. Every time you open your mouth with this unfounded nonsense, it shows how affraid you are. |
|
|
|
Apr 3 2005, 07:57 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Semi-Member ![]() Group: Members Posts: 64 Joined: 9-November 04 Member No.: 4,143 |
-sawman- How is BigUnionGuy desperate? And afraid of what? There is not a chance in hell that the APWA, or whatever it is is, will succeed. 7,000 a month pension???? Yeah, UPS will support providing a pension such as this! Let me drop a check in the mail to get the APWA rolling!!! UPS labor management would rip this quasi-union a new one when it came down to it. It takes experience to deal with negotiations!!
|
|
|
|
Apr 3 2005, 11:14 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Semi-Member ![]() Group: Members Posts: 41 Joined: 25-December 02 Member No.: 1,305 |
BUG, do you know why APWA is registered as a "Religious Non-Profit" entity?? Just asking!
|
|
|
|
Apr 3 2005, 04:10 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 206 Joined: 13-July 04 Member No.: 3,932 |
SWdriver,
Couldn't have said it any better myself. If you notice, all sawman talks about is the pension. He and his cohorts, make no claim as to their ability, experience, or involvement, with the Teamsters or even their Local. As you pointed out, do you think they could negotiate a collective bargaining agreement with UPS ??? Not a chance. Curiously, they don't even address that. But, they have assembled a "team" of experts. They certainly have. LIDRiver, Maybe sawman could answer that one. Kind of speaks volumes, doesn't it ??? Evidenced by the fact, they only registered their domain name for one (1) year, really shows a long term commitment. -Bug- |
|
|
|
Apr 3 2005, 04:53 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 160 Joined: 15-February 05 Member No.: 4,336 |
Lets see, registering as a Religious non-profit organization is just a category that they put, Not for profit organizations into, it has nothing to do with religion.
As far as rigestering for one year, this is because they plan on filing with the NLRB as a Union within a year. |
|
|
|
Apr 3 2005, 05:07 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 400 Joined: 17-August 04 Member No.: 4,002 |
Sending 150$ to a PO Box listed on a website that hides the registrants information is always a good idea
let me start a few sites like that sawman, i'll make some obsurd promises about how i have 10million dollars i need to get out of south africa for some reason or other.... |
|
|
|
Apr 3 2005, 05:46 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Semi-Member ![]() Group: Members Posts: 41 Joined: 25-December 02 Member No.: 1,305 |
But why register as a Religious entity when you are not. I'm not a scholar (only a retired truck driver), but it seems decieving to me to register that way. I can't see how a labor union and religion are related. Is this the only way APWA could be registered. Were there no other catagories that APWA could be registered??
|
|
|
|
Apr 4 2005, 04:20 AM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 160 Joined: 15-February 05 Member No.: 4,336 |
That is just how they group NOT FOR PROFIT ENTITIES>
As far as the P.O. Box, that is because the APWA is new and do not "YET" have the funding to open a office, Nor is it cost effective, because the APWA has no full time employees at this time. The officers and members of the APWA are UPS Employees, and they conduct meetings, and handle the APWA business on there time, when they're not at work. This will change once they are a registered union, they will have to start hiring full-time staff, open union halls, etc. |
|
|
|
Apr 4 2005, 10:49 AM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 400 Joined: 17-August 04 Member No.: 4,002 |
[quote=sawman]That is just how they group NOT FOR PROFIT ENTITIES>
As far as the P.O. Box, that is because the APWA is new and do not "YET" have the funding to open a office, Nor is it cost effective, because the APWA has no full time employees at this time. The officers and members of the APWA are UPS Employees, and they conduct meetings, and handle the APWA business on there time, when they're not at work. This will change once they are a registered union, they will have to start hiring full-time staff, open union halls, etc.[/quote] oooh... so we'll still have high union dues to pay for all these people in on the ground floor of this union to have cushy salaries sitting in some union hall doing nothing at all with UPS anymore? man, this is looking better and better all the time you sure these people arent just looking to switch careers and leading a union sounds better to them then humping boxes? |
|
|
|
Apr 4 2005, 11:48 AM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Hardcore Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,930 Joined: 1-July 02 From: citizen of the world Member No.: 205 |
APWA is just a UPS corporate wet dream, the employees couldn't be so ignorant that they would fall for this, would they?
|
|
|
|
Apr 4 2005, 06:08 PM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 206 Joined: 13-July 04 Member No.: 3,932 |
Farley,
Who is backing them ?? This is yet to be seen. But, whats your guess ??? Van Skillman- Help Us, monetarily. Danny Eason- "then if you are still leery, we will have one of our experts explain it to you. Again, asking for your "financial support", to help achieve OUR mission. These are two (2) feeder drivers that are a Disgrace to Local Union No. 391, and the Teamsters in general. What I find even more interesting, that sawman, continue's to refer to the APWA as "THEY". Maybe, just maybe, sawman is their mouthpiece here on T-net. I think its time to put them on "front street". Call them out....... -Bug- |
|
|
|
Apr 4 2005, 10:40 PM
Post
#13
|
|
|
New Member Group: Members Posts: 4 Joined: 9-February 03 From: Raleigh, NC Member No.: 1,710 |
[quote="BigUnionGuy"]Readers,
Just doing a quick search, the self-appointed Leaders of the APWA are trying to Hide who they really are. Their domain name; itsmymap.com, is very well concealed. THEY HAVE IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES, WHY DON'T YOU IDENTIFY YOURSELF. THERE'S NO INFORMATION POSTED IN YOUR PROFILE? WHO'S BACKING YOU? [color=blue][/color] |
|
|
|
Apr 4 2005, 11:14 PM
Post
#14
|
|
|
New Member Group: Members Posts: 4 Joined: 9-February 03 From: Raleigh, NC Member No.: 1,710 |
Farley states APWA is just a UPS corporate wet dream, the employees couldn't be so ignorant that they would fall for this...
WHY NOT, WE FELL FOR THE TEAMSTER'S EMPTY PROMISES. I SEE YOU'RE RETIRED. WELL AFTER 35 YEARS WITH UPS, I'M NOT. AT THE RATE WE'RE GOING NOW, ANY REPRESENTATION AT ALL WOULD BE BETTER THAN WHAT I'VE HAD IN THE PAST 18 YEARS. UPS CONTRIBUTES MORE THAN ENOUGH FOR IT'S EMPLOYEES. THE TEAMSTERS HAVE FAILED TO PROVIDE WHAT THEY PROMISED. FORGET POLITICS, THE STOCK MARKET, AND 911. IT'S NOBODY'S FAULT BUT THOSE MANAGING THE EMPLOYEES BENEFIT PROGRAMS. OUR TEAMSTER PENSION IS NO MORE THAN ANOTHER BIG SOCIAL SECURITY SCAM. CIPRIANI ONCE STATED TO ME, YOU NEVER EXPECT TO RECEIVE WHAT HAS BEEN PAID IN FOR YOU. WHY NOT? SOUNDS JUST LIKE SOCIAL SECURITY TO ME. |
|
|
|
Apr 5 2005, 12:59 AM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 400 Joined: 17-August 04 Member No.: 4,002 |
nobody dissagree's with the fact that pension plans for UPSers need to be reevaluated, and possibly even taken over by the company.
the thing is, starting a new union won't accomplish anything. a union is for collective bargaining, this is better accomplished with more people in the same union, besides having half in one and half in another... splitting up would weaken the teamsters bargaining power. not only that, but UPS could easily take advantage of AWPA because they know it's new and has absolutely NO funds to support a strike against big brown. Whereas now, UPS knows that the teamsters could possibly handle a drawn out strike with the monetary support of all teamsters, not just the UPS teamsters. What would AWPA offer that the teamsters don't? Besides this magic 7000$ payout in pension that nobody can explain except for Enron's accountant? It'll still be a money consuming union based exactly on the same structure as the teamsters with BA's, union halls, officers, full time employee's to clean the union hall, do the books, whatever else... AWPA isn't offering ANY new revolutionary ideas in running a union outside some great plan that will double everyones pension! wow... i got a bridge in brooklyn to sell you buddy. i got a better, more logical, and more reasonable idea... why dont we all just get togethor and elect new officials that will change the way the money fed into the union is handled, including our union dues, pension, and whatever else... |
|
|